Understanding a Clinically Integrated Network
A clinically integrated network, or CIN, is a structured alliance of hospitals, clinics, and/or providers. Members work together around shared quality outcomes, coordinated care, and collective payer strategy. For independent and rural healthcare organizations, a CIN offers a way to improve performance. It also helps reduce unneeded cost variations, and lets them provide value-based care while remaining fully independent.
Rather than operating in isolation, organizations in a CIN align clinically and operationally. They can measure outcomes consistently, manage populations more effectively, and negotiate with payers from a position of strength. CINs offer an important strategic option for rural clinics, physicians, and hospitals. Those options are critical as reimbursement pressure increases and value-based care expectations expand. They get the benefits of scale without losing their independence.
This article explains what a CIN is. It covers how one works, the types of CINs that exist, how they differ from Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs). It also offers key strategic questions to ask before joining or forming a CIN.
This article compares EHR vs EMR, and explains what each system includes, when an EMR is enough, when an EHR becomes essential, and how Azalea’s solutions fit into both categories. You’ll also see how each option helps support patient care, clinical workflows, and long-term growth.
“When a clinically integrated network is done right and structured correctly, this should be removing some work from the frontline teams by centralizing our data, by centralizing care transitions, payer paperwork.
What Is a CIN?
A clinically integrated network is an alliance of hospitals, clinics, physicians, and/or other providers. Members commit to shared clinical standards. They also commit to aligned incentives and coordinated care delivery. The primary goals are to improve quality, cost, and efficiency. They do that by reducing unnecessary variations in care while also creating the infrastructure needed to support advanced payer arrangements.
Many CINs form in response to challenges common in rural settings. These include declining reimbursements, limited negotiating leverage with commercial payers, workforce shortages, rising administrative burden, and the ongoing shift from fee-for-service reimbursement toward value-based models.
A CIN goes beyond informal collaboration. It requires real clinical and operational integration. Participating organizations agree to:
- Share data
- Follow defined care pathways
- Measure performance against common benchmarks
- Participate in network governance
Being integrated lets network members negotiate collectively while remaining compliant with federal antitrust and regulatory requirements.
Types of CINs
Clinically integrated networks can take several shapes depending on who leads them and what problems they aim to solve:
- Some are hospital-led, bringing in independent practices to unify care across a region.
- Others are physician-led, giving independent providers a way to coordinate without joining a health system.
- Many are state-level or multiregional, especially in rural areas where scale is essential for payer relevance.
- Some combine hospitals, clinics, and post-acute providers into one aligned structure.
The common thread is collaboration built around measurable clinical improvement.
Requirements for Clinically Integrated Networks
To operate as a CIN, each organization must commit to consistent measurement and transparent reporting. Participants will need:
- Shared clinical pathways
- Integrated data systems
- Aligned incentives
- A governance model that lets providers guide quality standards
Data sharing plays a central role in a clinically integrated network. CINs use population health data, claims data, clinical information, quality metrics, and care-coordination tools to track progress and support patient transitions. The network must also demonstrate that its integration is reducing variation or improving quality in ways payers can verify.
A Clinically Integrated Network vs an ACO
An Accountable Care Organization (ACO) is a group of healthcare providers who voluntarily come together to coordinate care for a specific patient population, with the goal of improving quality, reducing unnecessary spending, and sharing in the savings achieved
CINs have a broad platform for clinical and operational alignment. An ACO is a specific model, usually driven by Medicare. An ACO focuses on cost effectiveness and quality for a group of beneficiaries. A CIN can support multiple types of payer arrangements. An ACO generally participates in one structured program.
CINs often serve as the foundation for an ACO, but the two are not interchangeable. A CIN can exist without becoming an ACO. Many ACOs are created from existing CINs.
Existing CINs
Several rural regions have developed CINs to prepare for value-based care and rising payer pressure. Examples include the organizations featured in Azalea’s clinically integrated networks webinar, such as statewide CINs and multihospital alliances preparing for the 2030 mandate. By 2030 CMS is mandating that all Medicare users and most Medicaid users be treated on a value-based care model.
These networks include hospitals that are spread across large geographic areas. Even if those hospitals don’t routinely share patients, they still benefit from shared data infrastructure, unified quality goals, and a stronger payer negotiation position.
A CIN and Value-Based Care
CINs provide the infrastructure needed for value-based arrangements. They help organizations coordinate care, establish quality measures, and track population-level outcomes. They also let small hospitals and clinics share the cost of tools, such as analytics platforms or care-coordination teams.
For rural providers, the most immediate value often comes from having greater negotiating power. A CIN lets smaller organizations work with payers as a single aligned group. This can lead to improved reimbursement rates and more realistic quality target than smaller groups might achieve on their own.
CINs also help organizations meet the changes and demands of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act and the Rural Health Transformation (RHT) Program.
Why Join or Form a CIN?
Joining a clinically integrated network lets small and independent providers achieve the scale required for modern payment models without sacrificing autonomy. As reimbursement continues to shift toward value-based arrangements, scale increasingly determines which organizations can participate on favorable terms.
A CIN brings multiple providers together under a shared clinical and operational framework. This makes it possible to meet payer expectations that would be unrealistic for a single rural hospital or small practice to manage alone.
Through a CIN, participants gain access to a shared infrastructure that supports quality measurement, data analytics, and care coordination. Instead of each organization building and maintaining these capabilities independently, the network spreads both cost and effort across its members. A shared approach supports a unified quality strategy, consistent reporting, and clearer insight into performance across the continuum of care.
CINs also reduce administrative complexity. Negotiating payer contracts, managing quality reporting, and monitoring compliance with value-based requirements all take time and expertise. A network structure lets these responsibilities be handled in a coordinated way. It frees local teams to focus on patient care and operational priorities rather than contract management and revenue shortfalls.
Workforce constraints make this model especially valuable in rural settings. Many organizations struggle to recruit and retain specialized roles such as care coordinators, data analysts, or quality improvement staff. CINs help address these gaps by centralizing key functions or sharing specialized resources across the network. The result is improved consistency and reduced strain on small teams.
Perhaps most importantly, CINs preserve members’ independence. They develop clinical and operational alignment without forcing hospitals or practices into acquisition, employment, or system ownership. For organizations that value local control and community connection, a CIN offers a path to collaboration. It strengthens sustainability while allowing each participant to remain independent and mission driven.
Why a CIN Might Not Be the Right Fit
Not every organization is ready for a CIN. Some may not have the leadership alignment needed to adopt shared protocols. Others may be hesitant to commit the time required for governance, data integration, or performance measurement. A CIN also takes sustained engagement, and not all organizations want to take that on.
Scale is another factor. A CIN must include enough members to be relevant to payers. In states with many small hospitals, this often means building a broad coalition.
Questions to Consider Before Joining a CIN
Organizations evaluating a CIN should clarify how governance works, what data will be shared, how quality metrics are selected, what costs are involved, and what level of risk is expected over time. Refer to this CIN checklist if you’re considering forming or joining a CIN.
How to Join or Form a CIN
Most networks follow a phased approach. They assess readiness, identify partners, create governance structures, and connect their data systems. After establishing quality priorities, they begin working on care-coordination strategies and preparing for value-based contracts. Organizations typically start with low-risk arrangements and expand as their infrastructure matures.
The early phase is often the most important. Clear governance, shared goals, and transparent expectations set the foundation for everything that follows.
Wrapping Up
Clinically integrated networks give rural hospitals and independent providers a realistic way to prepare for value-based care models without giving up control. Instead of forcing consolidation or acquisition, a CIN creates alignment. Shared quality, data, and care coordination lets each organization be locally governed and community focused. That balance matters, especially in rural settings where independence often ties directly to trust and long-term viability.
By pooling resources and standardizing how care gets measured and improved, CINs help organizations move beyond survival mode. Shared analytics, common quality goals, and coordinated workflows allow participants to see patterns they could not identify on their own. Over time, this visibility supports better clinical decisions, smoother transitions of care, and more consistent patient experiences across settings.
CINs also change the conversation with payers. Rather than negotiating from a position of fragmentation or isolation, rural providers can present themselves as a unified, clinically aligned network with documented performance. That scale improves leverage, supports more sustainable reimbursement models, and opens the door to value-based arrangements that may otherwise be out of reach.
For rural providers facing ongoing financial pressure, staffing constraints, and rising administrative demands, a CIN offers a practical path forward. Success depends on thoughtful design, strong governance, and real clinical engagement. When those elements are in place, clinically integrated networks help organizations deliver coordinated care, adapt to evolving payment expectations, and strengthen their role as trusted anchors in the communities they serve.
The early phase is often the most important. Clear governance, shared goals, and transparent expectations set the foundation for everything that follows.
About the Author
